Postby ChrisThies » Sun Jun 01, 2003 1:58 am
IMO this is the best thread recently running. I put Vadi's treatise just below Fiore on my book priority list account of Anglo's comments (page 132; note #40). I've since re-evaluated my procrastination and will order Monday once I confirm in stock from publisher. Anyway, my question relates specifically to unterhau's from the back/tail stance: Has anyone done sufficient test cutting (perhaps even using both parallel and tapered edged blades) from the tail guard using both true and false edge to set me straight? I'm just a new guy with JC's 'blue book' and a waster, but my true edge unterhau's from trail have to be performed SLOW for me to maintain what I assume to be proper blade alignment in regards to the motion of my swing. If I try to add some power [=strength + speed] it appears that my blade would not quite strike in proper alignment to my swing for a decent cut (i.e. appears prone to tumbling/deflection), or at the very least the range of my 'effective target area' (?) is severely limited in order to maintain assumed proper alignment. Whereas with the false edge unterhau from the tail guard, once I get over that initial 'hump' of getting the false edge leading, the blade feels like it is in a natural alignment with the swing motion, and the 'effective target area' range would appear to be greater. Do I just need more practice or is there some fundamental technique to tail guard unterhau's which I should be instilling now at the onset of my training in long sword? Also, assuming Vadi experience was probably based upon the tapered edge (poorer cutting) spadone, would proper blade alignment be of even more concern - if not mandatory - as compared to unterhau's with a parallel edged blade?
{Good fencers make good neighbors}
Christopher Thies