So I bought Reclaiming the Blade, have a few questions...

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Jonathan_Kaplan
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: Central Kentucky

So I bought Reclaiming the Blade, have a few questions...

Postby Jonathan_Kaplan » Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:04 pm

My questins with regards to Reclaiming the Blade are in the two disc special edition, on disc 2, with the roughly an hour of sword training videos. Specifically -- how high quality or useful do you all consider the non arma ones? Does anyone have any particular complaints? Arma's stuff definitely seemed some of the more dynamic, that's for sure -- but is the other stuff that bad? Has anyone any opinions on this section of the documentary?

User avatar
Sal Bertucci
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Denver area, CO

Postby Sal Bertucci » Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:26 pm

Don't know. Haven't seen it.

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Re: So I bought Reclaiming the Blade, have a few questions..

Postby Randall Pleasant » Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:58 pm

Jonathan_Kaplan wrote:My questins with regards to Reclaiming the Blade are in the two disc special edition, on disc 2, with the roughly an hour of sword training videos. Specifically -- how high quality or useful do you all consider the non arma ones? Does anyone have any particular complaints? Arma's stuff definitely seemed some of the more dynamic, that's for sure -- but is the other stuff that bad? Has anyone any opinions on this section of the documentary?

Jonathan

First, only the ARMA Director can speak for ARMA, thus the following is only my personal view.
Second, I don't have the two disk edition so I can only comment on what I see in on the first disk.

There are two things that really stood out to me:
1.) All videos where shinai SLOs are used in sparring looked totally crappy. A shinai is a SLO, SLOs are crappy, and you can't make crappy look good.
2.) I remember seeing some really bad footwork.


SLO = sword like object
Ran Pleasant

Chris Ouellet
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

Postby Chris Ouellet » Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:01 pm

The one stand out is "To stand on a stone" which is really quite terrible, it's the sort of thing people at bullshido rightfully make fun of. The techniques would mostly only work with compliant opponents, the sword section is dreadful, "windows" and the dancing is downright absurd, reminiscent of bad 80's era stuff, really really bad.
The rapier work in Alfen's la Scherma is basic and reasonable.
Tom Urso is really good, the techniques he show are correct.
Master Ott's westling is solid.
Armored and unarmored training seem serious but lack energy, I wouldn't call them bad.
The same can be said for Silver's Four Fights, though their sparing is a little more vigorous it still lacks that edge that convinces me they are determined towards real violence. I really dislike the English hanging guard they use, I've had someone try their exact guard against me and it failed miserably at well, everything but that's a fine point.

It's overall quite OK with the glaring exception of of "to stand on a stone" which really I don't know how it got in there.


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.