Off-hand Training

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

william_cain_iii
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: goldsboro, north carolina

Off-hand Training

Postby william_cain_iii » Wed May 26, 2010 9:00 am

What merit is there in learning to fight with your off hand?

I've had a lot of people tell me a lot of different things, but I realized I hadn't asked it here.

Myself, I would think there's plenty of merit, since it would make sure your arms were equally strong, and in the odd circumstance you had to switch arms you could do so, but I've had some people laugh at the idea.

What's the ARMA opinion on this idea?
"The hardest enemy to face is he whose presence you have grown accustomed to."

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Postby Stacy Clifford » Wed May 26, 2010 11:41 am

We don't have any official position on it, that's up to the individual, but training is all about making yourself combat effective. Anything that makes you a more versatile fighter better able to deal with an unexpected situation or opportunity is hardly a bad thing. I would say that it's better to have a high level of skill in your dominant hand than to be mediocre with both, but improving the use of your off hand is certainly useful and worth some effort. My advice would be learn to fight well with one hand first, while drilling with the other for exercise, and then concentrate on copying your skill to the other hand.
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX

User avatar
Sal Bertucci
Posts: 591
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:04 pm
Location: Denver area, CO

Postby Sal Bertucci » Wed May 26, 2010 7:12 pm

Any Master that I have read that talked about it said it would be a plus.

User avatar
Steven Ott
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:33 pm

Postby Steven Ott » Fri May 28, 2010 3:54 pm

According to a documentary I saw, Musashi who fought with a long and a short sword, would use his left hand to throw the shortsword and won a duel in this fashion. I think in rapier and dagger combat that would be a viable (though difficult skill to develop). Most people who throw knives hold it in such a way that it obvious what their intention is. If a dagger was thrown from the standard grip accurately it would be hard to detect and hard to counter.
In this life peace can never be an external force-only an internal source

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Postby Stacy Clifford » Sat May 29, 2010 3:29 pm

The type of dagger most often used with a rapier really wasn't made very well for throwing, it's designed as a defensive weapon to be kept in the hand. Could it be done in a pinch? Yes, but it would require more skill and practice to be accurate than other, better balanced types of daggers. Though I've never handled one, the Japanese short sword looks like it might throw better from the design of it, but then again we're talking about Musashi here, not your average warrior. The masters tended to avoid teaching things with a low probability of success and a high probability of negative consequences, and throwing away your weapons falls into that category. Just because one guy can get away with it doesn't mean you should teach it to everybody (especially because then they would know how to recognize and counter it). There are plenty of things that CAN be done that you won't find in the manuals because 10% of students would pull it off and the other 90% who tried it would come back in a box, which is really bad for your teaching business.
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX

User avatar
Steven Reich
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:03 am

Postby Steven Reich » Sat May 29, 2010 7:27 pm

Marcelli describes the method of throwing your dagger in his 1686 treatise. However, that is the only treatise I can think of that talks about it and it's clearly not a primary tactic--it's just a short section towards the end of the work.

Steve

C.Scott Relleve
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 2:53 pm

Postby C.Scott Relleve » Sat May 29, 2010 11:54 pm

Steven Ott wrote:According to a documentary I saw, Musashi who fought with a long and a short sword, would use his left hand to throw the shortsword and won a duel in this fashion. I think in rapier and dagger combat that would be a viable (though difficult skill to develop). Most people who throw knives hold it in such a way that it obvious what their intention is. If a dagger was thrown from the standard grip accurately it would be hard to detect and hard to counter.


I think I know how they throw it, and it'll only work within 5 meters, which is pretty much the range of a typical sword duel. The knife or short sword has to be balanced for throwing for it to penetrate sufficiently, and most short swords aren't meant for throwing. However, it is an interesting and unpredictable tactic, and it definitely merits some time to train to, although it seems that in order to be effective with this, a whole lot of time of training this is necessary, time that can also be used to keep training with your primary weapon...

william_cain_iii
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: goldsboro, north carolina

Postby william_cain_iii » Sun May 30, 2010 3:44 am

Indeed, I am looking to learn rapier and dagger after I gain sufficient talent with the longsword. I don't think I'd be inclined to throw my parrying dagger though.
"The hardest enemy to face is he whose presence you have grown accustomed to."

User avatar
Phil Valot
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 11:01 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Postby Phil Valot » Mon May 31, 2010 3:26 pm

Althought I am new to this forum, I have trained and studied combat arts for most of my life, training to use your off hand is just as important as training your primary. Let's face it, a sword is a weapon used in combat, during combat your objective is to defeat the enemy before he defeats you which in reality is survival. In order to survive one must be prepared for any situation including becoming disabled during combat. I practice this theory in both martial arts and tactical shooting. It's as simple as letting your arm hang there or having it tied to your side is best to stop you from using it for balance. Apply this concept to your legs and learn the importance of having to strike with your sword without having a firm stance. Things do not always work out in your favor when engaged in combat and a good warrior will always prepare for the worst. I recommend adding Disabled Fighting to your training the reward is great.
A Templar Knight is truly a fearless knight, and secure on every side, for his soul is protected by the armour of faith, just as his body is protected by the armour of steel. He is thus doubly armed, and need fear neither demons nor men.

william_cain_iii
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: goldsboro, north carolina

Postby william_cain_iii » Mon May 31, 2010 7:40 pm

Intriguing answer, Mr. Valot, and well-reasoned. Thank you to everyone who's taken the time to comment on what was really quite an idle question, you're all too kind.

Might you be amenable to contact via email, Mr. Valot? I have some questions I am interested in asking you. Purely in the spirit of inquiry.
"The hardest enemy to face is he whose presence you have grown accustomed to."


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.