Why so little winding in freeplay?

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
John_Clements
Posts: 1167
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2002 10:43 pm
Location: Atlanta area

Re: Why so little winding in freeplay?

Postby John_Clements » Wed Dec 17, 2003 12:14 pm

I agree with Casper, as long as you don't let them bounce off on contact, you can indeed wind with padded weapons, but they are clumsier at it.

I also completely agree with Jay in that winding occurs very very quickly in a fight and opponents who are too soft are beaten (but if too hard you exploit that too just as instantly).

JC
Do NOT send me private messages via Forum messenger. I NEVER read them. To contact me please use direct email instead.

User avatar
Brian Hunt
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:03 am
Location: Price, Utah
Contact:

Re: Why so little winding in freeplay?

Postby Brian Hunt » Wed Dec 17, 2003 12:38 pm

press drills with helmets . . . good idea, will have to start implementing that one.

Brian Hunt.
Tuus matar hamsterius est, et tuus pater buca sabucorum fundor!

http://www.paulushectormair.com
http://www.emerytelcom.net/users/blhunt/sales.htm

Stuart McDermid
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 8:48 pm

Re: Why so little winding in freeplay?

Postby Stuart McDermid » Wed Dec 17, 2003 5:12 pm

Hi John,

I was referring to short German Longswords not to short swords in general.
Cheers,
Stu.

User avatar
Jake_Norwood
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 11:46 am
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: Why so little winding in freeplay?

Postby Jake_Norwood » Wed Dec 17, 2003 5:53 pm

Hi Stu.

Looking back I see I missread your post somewhat. Perhaps because you brought up the twitch--another patently German move tightly associated with binding and winding--I thought initially that you were saying that the shorter swords were better at winding/binding. I see that's not the case, but it's also true that Meyer's weapons--which appear to be greatswords--twitch constantly, as is likewise demonstrated in Ringeck, etc.

I do agree that a longer weapon paradoxically lends itself to more grappling, due to attempts to get past the point/inside range. On the other hand, Fiore grapples as much as Talhoffer, especially if you're of the mind that everything in the unarmed section is applicable to everything in the longsword section, etc.

So, in revision, I did misread your post (showing more agreement than before), but I also think that some of the base assumptions we're working on are flawed. Fixing that is the point of these discussions, however.

John-
I agree about fulen in masks entirely. As I focus on teaching and practicing more and more of Meyer, the more convinced I am of the need for a mask to safely practice most any technique he describes, whether in the bind or otherwise.

Jake
Sen. Free Scholar
ARMA Deputy Director


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

cron

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.