Postby John_Clements » Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:30 pm
Plenty, Eddie. But they are persona non grata on this forum for cheating our members, exploiting our club, deceiving our membership, shipping substandard and second rate items to our members, misrepresenting ARMA's product development, abusing our endorsement, taking advantage of their relationship with us, and generally dishonest interaction with several of our Study Groups around the country. I blame myself for covering for them too long and for allowing friendship to interfere with how I should have been looking out for the good of our constituent subscribers. Never again. We no longer rely on a sole vendor for any equipment. And we certainly no longer endorse or recommend any business with them (...which of course, since our doing so we are now on their hit list).
Anyway, end of that topic. [Note: This not an opening for their distributors to come here and praise them or rag on us for having legitimate consumer complaints about their product quality and unethical business practices. Any attempts by their allies to highjack this thread for their commercial marketing will be deleted.]
Re woodenweapons.com handles & stoutness: yes, this is true ---but--- by having these approved models built this way it's easier for each student to custom finish their piece as needed by tapering the blade if they want to (or not) and thinning down or adding to the handle to fit their own personal grip. It’s much cheaper than ordering a more expensive custom piece and waiting longer for it or having to use a one-style-fits all generic design. I think a student's waster should be individualized to suit them. Make sense?
As to the thick guard issue, I agree, yes, that is a problem when trying to use different fingering methods with wasters, but that’s another reason why you should also practice with a steel replica blade as well.
JC
Do NOT send me private messages via Forum messenger. I NEVER read them. To contact me please use direct email instead.