My biggest issue is the actual proper size of a Bastard Sword at the moment, I've read they varied anywhere from 33 to 44 inches in blade length, but that doesnt tell me anything in how long the hilt shoudl be nor the crosspiece.
Hilts are usually within the vicinity of 10-15 inches for these types of swords. The are historical examples of more long hilted ones, and most of those stems from the late 15th/early 16th Century.
For starters, what's a good length and width for someone that tall? his concept cketch has him with a fairly wide-bladed weapon, that pobably measures a good 55" from tip to pommel, the blade if placed point down had the pommel resting just beneath his ribcage, and the blade tapered to a width of about equal to 2.5" at midpoint, similar to how a gladius tapered down (But without the leafing at the tip)
Well, historically speaking, the only one I've come across so far that designates any specific swordlength in regards to height is Filippo Vadi. He was a fightmaster in Italy who got his work published c1490. In it[
Arte Gladitoria Dimicandi] he mentions at one point that a sword should, when placed with the tip on the ground, reach with its pommel to you armpit. It is most likely though that he was discussing a specific type of sword within a specific context; i.e. a sword for judicial combat.
The length you have specified isn't outside the limits of historical swords though. There are historical examples that could well match your sword in length. Although at the farther extremes of those kinds of lengths the terminology shifts slightly -more towards proper two-handers. Physically speaking there is an upper limit of when it becomes a full-on necessity to exclusively handle a sword with two hands. But it's hard to state any specific rules without getting too speculative.
When discussing width we enter a whole different ballpark. Basically because the modern illustrative arts differ slightly from reality when depicting swords. Most modern fantasy art I've come across tends to overdo it grossly on the width of the blades. As a reference I can mention that the widest historical blade I personally have heard of measured IIRC 2.6 inches at the cross. Most crosses usually measure roughly 8-10 inches.
For ease of reference I'm providing you with a couple of links to some modern recreations of historical pieces:
http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/johnsson/sword-museum-svante.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/johnsson/sword-museum-stmaurice.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/johnsson/sword-museum-tritonia.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/johnsson/sword-museum-brescia.htm as well as a couple of more generic types (representing different swords from oakeshott's typology):
http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-medieval-talhoffer-xva.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-medieval-landgraf-xvii.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-medieval-munich-xviiib.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-medieval-regent-xviiia.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-medieval-viceroy-xxa.htm http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/nextgen/sword-medieval-danish-2-hander.htm These were all designed by sword-smith and researcher Peter Johnsson, one of the world's biggest authorities on historical European bladed weaponry. I know that some of the models I picke dout for you doesn't match up with the desired time period, but I included them to give you a vide range of blades that somehow touche dupon that which we have been discussing. Judging from the description you've giving me so far it almost sounds to me like perhaps some kind of oversized version of the Svante sword would be your best bet. Keep in mind though that, aside from Vadi, there really doesn't exist any sources that I know of that stipulates that when you're of a certain height you should/must have a sword of a certain length.
I'm also providing you with a link to an online presentation to Oakeshott's typology:
http://bjorn.foxtail.nu/oakeshott_eng.htm He's supposed to be, in style, half power half finiesse, so would a Shcivonia (Which I may erronoulsy view as sort of a 'Heavy Rapier' with it's duelit inspired basket hilt and desgin) be more suited to him for an Western Europe background?
Trust me, you can get all the finesse you want out of a bastard sword or a long sword. <img src="/forum/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" /> Take the Next generation Talhoffer for instance. I own that particular swords and it's one of the most viscious, quick and agile swords I've handled. I've also had the pleasure to handle the Svante and that's one of my all-time favorite swords. It's weight (when printed on paper) belies its agility. You see, when dealing with swords, weight and mass is a relative things. The Svante weighs in at 4 lbs (which is close to the upper limit for swords of that variety) but you don't feel the weight at all when handling it. It's all about balance and distribution of mass. The Svante is as the Talhoffer; quick, vicious and
powerful And you slightly of on the Schiavona. It's a regular sword.
Albeit a basket hilted one.
Best regards,