Master Ott's Wrestling

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

User avatar
Webmaster
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2002 9:19 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby Webmaster » Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:19 pm

From the folks in ARMA Poland we have a new introduction to Master Ott's Wrestling:

http://www.thearma.org/Manuals/master-ott-wrestling.html
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Stacy Clifford
ARMA Webmaster

User avatar
Jeff Hansen
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Pelham, AL

Re: Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby Jeff Hansen » Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:13 am

Great stuff! <img src="/forum/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" /> I've been hoping someone was working on this. I tried to do it myself, but translating archaic german without even knowing modern german was beyond me. <img src="/forum/images/icons/crazy.gif" alt="" /> Thanks guys, great work.
Jeff Hansen
ARMA FS
Birmingham, AL study group leader

"A coward believes he will ever live
if he keep him safe from strife:
but old age leaves him not long in peace
though spears may spare his life." - from The Havamal

User avatar
Jeffrey Hull
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:40 pm
Location: USA

Re: Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby Jeffrey Hull » Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:43 am

I like how Ott recommends for wrestling three general tactical axioms regarding timing and mode, depending whether foe is weaker (thus before &amp; quickness), stronger (after &amp; yielding), or equal (with &amp; balance).

Does anyone think this is also a generally helpful way to regard armed fighting as well, or not?

Thanks to Sylwester, Bart &amp; Monika!
JLH

*Wehrlos ist ehrlos*

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Re: Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby JeffGentry » Fri Aug 12, 2005 10:57 pm

Hey Jeff

I like how Ott recommends for wrestling three general tactical axioms regarding timing and mode, depending whether foe is weaker (thus before &amp; quickness), stronger (after &amp; yielding), or equal (with &amp; balance).

Does anyone think this is also a generally helpful way to regard armed fighting as well, or not?


We have been doing more dagger and unarmed lately, and i do see how the unarmed principle's apply to the weapon stuff as far as, vor, nach, weak and hard, as well as movenment.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis

Usque ad Finem

Grace, Focus, Fluidity

User avatar
Jeffrey Hull
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:40 pm
Location: USA

Re: Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby Jeffrey Hull » Sat Aug 13, 2005 12:57 pm

Okay, cool.

How about this:

Do you think the key fulcrum to winning at *equal* and *with* usually is either of ones own hips ?
JLH



*Wehrlos ist ehrlos*

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Re: Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby JeffGentry » Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:39 pm

Hey Jeff

Do you think the key fulcrum to winning at *equal* and *with* usually is either of ones own hips ?


Oh most definately, When you are attacking you need to be hip's in when defending pull your hip's out or down.

Even in ground fighting in order to gain control drop your hip's toward the ground and stay off your knee's and it transfer's your weight to your opponent there by limiting his ability to move.

Or when your caught in a cross body/side mount move your hip's away from the opponent and he has to scramble to control your movement.

It is very similar in standing try to throw someone who is six inche's away and then do it with your hip against them just a little lower than there's then have them lower there hip's, or get on your back on the ground and have someone lean there elbow's on your chest while on there knee's then stretch there feet back and put there hip's on the ground see the weight diffrence.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis



Usque ad Finem



Grace, Focus, Fluidity

User avatar
Jeffrey Hull
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:40 pm
Location: USA

Re: Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby Jeffrey Hull » Sun Aug 14, 2005 1:08 pm

I agree regarding the hip as primary. One could argue it always is so, whether in "equal/with" fight or otherwise.

I was just curious if someone advocated the thigh/shank instead, or even the shoulder.

Hope my simple question was not too simplistic. I just like to pose the basic ones sometimes, helps to keep one's wrestling thinking grounded (heh, heh, little pun there).
JLH



*Wehrlos ist ehrlos*

User avatar
JeffGentry
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Columbus Ohio

Re: Master Ott's Wrestling

Postby JeffGentry » Sun Aug 14, 2005 5:57 pm

Hey Jeff

I know what you mean sometime's we put the basic's on the back burner in our thinking and it is alway's good to get them to the front and reheat them occasionaly.

Jeff
Semper Fidelis



Usque ad Finem



Grace, Focus, Fluidity


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.