JeffGentry wrote:That Fur covered shield kill's me, I just do not get it.
Why do people insist on this crap when there is so much more out there.
Jeff
M. Gentry,
People will insist on such miswended nonsense, because it is easier than applying the effort to learn more about the art. In that way, they can take on some of the attributes, without the vexing work required to be credible.
For example, many on this forum, have worked for several years to attain the functional aspects of Gothic/Renn/Baroque sword arts. Be that in group studies or as solitaries, it is a serious study in order to get it right. In that regard, ARMA, would be involved in the pragmatic aspects of study for this art.
Concerning their (the people with the large axes and fur covered shields) contention that they are learning 'knightly conduct' , that's a ambiguous condition. Normally, I'd not be averse to any conduct which improves personal morality, however such as knightly codes implied much more than swinging a steel blade around. And obviously, the social mnemonics of that condition and period, largely no longer exist within contemporary contexts. For most of the period, the condition of 'knight' was closely tied to the religious and social norms of the period. So, I doubt the organization in question is doing such things as; several days and nights isolated in places such as "St. Patrick's Purgatory', spending 3 nights prior to elevation fasting and praying before one's hilt, or in chapel, learning the rules for when to wear a penitent's shift after certain battles or fights, the very complex rules for social interaction under a fuedal bond, or even having to learn both chansons de geste or chansons de toile. So whether one attained it by inheritance or by merit, if done with serious intent, the status of 'knight' carried a whole range of knowledge and obligations beyond the simple use of a weapon.
And anyway, to get to enraptured about 'knight' is questionable ground. That class did do some appalling wrongs, sometimes in spite of their code, or because of it.