Rodolfo Martínez wrote:Hi everyone!
Its impressive the cutting power of a blunt straight sword. Some days ago i saw on tv a collector of a museum, saying that japanese warriors, in the XVII century prefered their own curved katanas instead of the straight doubled edged europead swords because katanas were superior and the straight swords were rustic and archaic. What about a green bamboo cutting blunt bastard sword? So, my question is, in an hypothetical case, can a blunt japanese katana cut as well as the ¨archaic¨ straight bastard swords?
Most museum curators have never cut anything with any sort of sword. For that matter, most museum curators probably have no experience with martial arts. For that matter, most museum curators fill their professional reading time with treatises on art-history and design-lineage, or peer-journals extolling the latest psycho-sexual criticism of artistic symbology, or articles about the newest utilitarian conservation techniques...Yet not with any fight-books.
A decent guess is that the quoted museumite was simply relaying one of the manifold, tired, wrong notions that plague the study of hoplology even as folks like us strive to make it fruitful, truthful and expansive.
If anyone finds all that unduly harsh, then please know that I say such because I am totally sick of the constant nonsense that some well-paid academics spout in smug expectation that it shall go uncontested beneath the aegis of their titles and tenure. Just bloody well had it with them.
I can count on one gauntlet the number of museum curators with whom I am acquainted who have bravely pulled themselves out of the peer-approval paradigm to try to understand the old arms and armour in a manner similar to how serious students of Renaissance martial arts strive to do.