Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
Well... Why shouldn't you?Mike Sheffield wrote:Should I go as in depth as I have with Japanese styles?
Question: as a smith who was trained in Japanese arts, when I make a Occidental sword would I be doing a great disservice to my customers not having gone as in depth with the western way?
I did just buy Mr. Clements book Medieval Swordsmanship. I joined this forum and bought this book hoping to gain a little insight into what you as Occidental stylist would need.
The problem I'm now having is is that enough? Should I go as in depth as I have with Japanese styles? Maybe I'm just over thinking again.
Mike Sheffield wrote:Question: as a smith who was trained in Japanese arts, when I make a Occidental sword would I be doing a great disservice to my customers not having gone as in depth with the western way? I did just buy Mr. Clements book Medieval Swordsmanship. I joined this forum and bought this book hoping to gain a little insight into what you as Occidental stylist would need. The problem I'm now having is is that enough? Should I go as in depth as I have with Japanese styles? Maybe I'm just over thinking again.
Jonathan Newhall wrote:Question: as a smith who was trained in Japanese arts, when I make a Occidental sword would I be doing a great disservice to my customers not having gone as in depth with the western way?
That's like asking "as a gun smith who is skilled in making M4s and M16s would I be doing a disservice to my customers if I attempted to make an AK-47 without first learning about it?"
The answer, of course, is going to be yes. You are specialized in a different region of the same art - similar, but not the same, and both deserve just as much attention when it comes to making pieces for customers or yourself.I did just buy Mr. Clements book Medieval Swordsmanship. I joined this forum and bought this book hoping to gain a little insight into what you as Occidental stylist would need.
Hmm, I think that a study of the blades themselves as well as that of their use would be a key. Basically, however you learned to forge eastern weaponry, apply that to how you learn to forge western weaponry - they're different and deserve individual attention.The problem I'm now having is is that enough? Should I go as in depth as I have with Japanese styles? Maybe I'm just over thinking again.
You should certainly go just as in depth into learning how to design western swords if you have a customer who wants one! I wouldn't build a mac-based computer and give it to a customer if all I knew how to make was windows-based computers, of course I'd research the other (very similar, but still different) platform thoroughly before I would commit to making one in order to assure quality to my customer(s) and make sure they would buy my products again.
Jaron Bernstein wrote:
You might read Oakeshott's books and handle as many western antique blades as possible.
Actually I learned the modern bladesmithing. Mostly American knife making.
t's not like I would be making a completely useless blade. to either a Japanese, Western, or even a Chinese stylist. I just feel that a little martial arts knowledge helps. Remember most smiths throughout history weren't full blown warriors. I guess I answered my own question a little.
Mike Sheffield wrote:Question: as a smith who was trained in Japanese arts, when I make a Occidental sword would I be doing a great disservice to my customers not having gone as in depth with the western way? I did just buy Mr. Clements book Medieval Swordsmanship. I joined this forum and bought this book hoping to gain a little insight into what you as Occidental stylist would need. The problem I'm now having is is that enough? Should I go as in depth as I have with Japanese styles? Maybe I'm just over thinking again.
Jonathan Newhall wrote:
Then I'd recommend, as before, going as in depth as possible into the making of various swords in technique before attempting to forge them for customers.
Completely useless? No, but nowhere near properly balanced I'd guess. It takes a lot of practice to learn how to make a full-sized sword that behaves like a proper sword, make sure to keep practicing and handling both antiques and modern reproductions of any kind of sword you think you want to forge in the future, experience is great when coupled with a few examples.
As for how far in you should learn the use and martial history? I'd say another book or two couldn't hurt, Clements' medieval swordsmanship work is a tad outdated at this point, although most of it is still very valid.
When you pick up a replica sword from, say, Albion, give it a few practice swings using what you found in the books to get how your own finished work should feel and handle, then try to recreate that is the best way to do it I guess - I'm no bladesmith, though :p
Keith Culbertson wrote:Hello Michael, just a note I hope you can take to heart---I am sure you have studied hard and want to do the right thing for this new direction, but please understand that it is a new deirection. There are plenty of great knifemakers out there who turn out sword-like objects, but if you want to craft a sword, you will have to learn a whole different set of techniques to find the strange, almost magical balance between resilience and resistance, and other such issues. I urge you to read some of the articles here on the ARMA website by Paul Champagne (RIP), or contact other sword-smiths like Kevin Cashen and Peter Johannsen (Albion) before you dive in. I certainly wish you the best in your endeavor,
sincerely
Mike Sheffield wrote:Thanks Jaron. I think I'm on the same page as you now.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||