nathan featherstone wrote:i must say to you all great points but they are ones i have thought on.
on the issue of herding cats i don't want them to be herded i want them to admit they are cats.
i want those involved to sit down and say i do wma here i am. whatever they want to do follows but if they want others it needs to be a little more accessible. as it took me a process of over a year to even learn of arma. not anyone's fault just wma is not highly talked about and dare i say it a "respected" art. don't want to offend but hopefully someone understands that comment.
and on the issue of competitions etc.
gene you make excellent points. but if i wanted fencing i would go do it but i dont want that. to me if your learning to use a sword you use one or as similar one as you can manage. not using a piece of wire and limiting your movements and techniques.
this is a marial art but judo kendo and a giant mix of Asian martial arts thrive as sports the question i pose is why cant we? and still keep our core values. i look at jogo du pao in Portugal that teaches a real European martial art not boiled down yet is accessible as a sport and competition as well. why cant something be done to make wma accessible to a world wide audience. just even do what arma does and have any sister groups agree to a core set of values to make competitions accessible to them. i feel they would give this art somewhere to point at and say look we are a real art.
now this might "water" the art down but if it makes it more accesible well we we have more involved and still have the reall pioneers of this art striving to be as accurate and as knowledgeable as they can. how do people feel on this idea?
Nathan, this conversation is going nowhere and I don't think we are what you are looking for. You seem to think that a "real art" needs sport competition. You seem to think that the more people who get involved in a watered-down sport, the better it is. Sorry, that is not what we are about. I would rather have 50 people in an organization that are committed to the same principals as me than 5000 that are looking for some plastic-and-metal shiny object to boost their ego because their daddy didn't pay enough attention to them when they were children.
A sport requires:
1. A fixed set of rules that can be arbitrated by impartial judges (next to impossible to find even in the best of circumstances, just look at the Olympics for guidance on this one), or electronic scoring equipment (hey, that's what modern fencing has)
2. Standardized equipment to make it fair to all competitors
3. Fixed uniforms
4. Safety equipment out the wazoo so that you can get insurance
5. Limiting the number of moves that can be performed, both for safety's sake and for the above-mentioned impartial judging
6. Judo was developed as a sport and it is a sport. That is not to say it cannot be used for self-defense purposes, but it is a sport. You won't learn leglocks in judo. Is this because they are not effective? Hardly. You won't learn them because it is not part of the sport system and is actually harmful to you to learn them in some cases because you might actually accidentally apply them in competition and get yourself disqualified. Kendo is a sport. The number of techniques are limited and the rules require artificial limitation (like shouting at the appropriate time). Jogo do pau is a sport. Once again, it has self-defense applications, but it is a sport. The list goes on and on.
That is not what we are about.
The whole point of organizations like ARMA is to try and reclaim our European MARTIAL heritage. As in our martial arts and sciences and fighting techniques. We've been doing this for some time now and really don't need people like you preaching to us about the need for "competition." It is because of sport competition (in part, anyway), that we lost what we once had.
Really, please, I don't think we are for you. I am not speaking for ARMA, but I don't appreciate you coming onto our forums and telling us what we "need" to do.
Really, once again, I don't think we are what you are looking for. It might be better for all if you were to just go learn sport fencing or something like it. This is not meant to be an insult; I have a high regard for sport fencers - they are athletes in the truest sense of the word and what they do keeps them in fine shape (which is more than you can say about a great number of people in the Historical Fencing community). But, you seem to want recognition and a rule based structure and that is not us.
Please don't post anymore about how we need competitions. We do just fine, thank you.


