Short intoduction and question about the equipment

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Roger Norling
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:57 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Postby Roger Norling » Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:29 am

Sal Bertucci wrote:Very much true. I know lots of people who have had much more injuries (both quantity and severity) than I have due to these "more safe" trainers.


I too agree that you still need to use control primarily. You can even hurt someone with a plastic spoon if you don't.

But, the nylons do allow for harder contact than steel when using little protection. During this year's Swordfish event the only protection allowed in the nylon tournament were mask, throat protection, gloves, a cup and soft knee protection. Although bruises and slight fractures were common, we had no serious injuries caused by the nylons themselves, although the fencing was quite hard.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ryrlen#p/u/3/9bbAdNRFQB4
Quarterstaff instructor
Gothenburg Free Fencers Guild
http://www.gffg.se

Member of MFFG
http://www.freifechter.com

Member of HEMAC
http://www.hemac.org

HROARR
http://www.hroarr.com

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Postby Stacy Clifford » Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:33 pm

Sal Bertucci wrote:While this is a good suggestion the problem is that no one reads the stickies anyway.


Agreed, we can't get half the people who sign up here to read the Forum Rules even with them posted on both the intro page and a sticky thread titled in all caps to make it more visible. Nonetheless, I may consider it for the other half.
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Postby Stacy Clifford » Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:42 pm

Roger Norling wrote:I too agree that you still need to use control primarily. You can even hurt someone with a plastic spoon if you don't.

But, the nylons do allow for harder contact than steel when using little protection. During this year's Swordfish event the only protection allowed in the nylon tournament were mask, throat protection, gloves, a cup and soft knee protection. Although bruises and slight fractures were common, we had no serious injuries caused by the nylons themselves, although the fencing was quite hard.


We've been using a similar level of protection with wood and steel (and plastic too) for years and had no worse results than you've had without going light on each other. In my experience the control of the practitioners is a lot more important to safety than the tool being used.
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX

Ian Mac Pharlaine
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:10 am
Location: Montgomery, Alabama
Contact:

Postby Ian Mac Pharlaine » Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:06 pm

Wow. I'm really digging those einsifer swords. Any idea what they cost for sharps and blunts? How do they compare to Albion, A&A, or Pavel Moc?

william_cain_iii
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: goldsboro, north carolina

Postby william_cain_iii » Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:44 pm

Basically, they're a middle-range option between the 'starter' stuff like the Tinker Blunt and the Hanwei Federschwert, and higher end things like the ones you mention.

Durability is comparable to an Albion or AnA, but handling suffers a little. Still, they have a neat rolled tip so they don't need any additional blunting for safe thrusts.
"The hardest enemy to face is he whose presence you have grown accustomed to."

Roger Norling
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:57 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Postby Roger Norling » Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:52 am

Stacy Clifford wrote:
Roger Norling wrote:I too agree that you still need to use control primarily. You can even hurt someone with a plastic spoon if you don't.

But, the nylons do allow for harder contact than steel when using little protection. During this year's Swordfish event the only protection allowed in the nylon tournament were mask, throat protection, gloves, a cup and soft knee protection. Although bruises and slight fractures were common, we had no serious injuries caused by the nylons themselves, although the fencing was quite hard.


We've been using a similar level of protection with wood and steel (and plastic too) for years and had no worse results than you've had without going light on each other. In my experience the control of the practitioners is a lot more important to safety than the tool being used.


I used to think that holding back the strikes in the absolute last part before impact didn't affect the fencing, but I have since changed my mind a bit. Not to mention the thrusts which are very different depending on if you have flex or not.
Of course you still need to use control so that you do not permanently injure your partner and I certainly do agree with you that control is vital, but it very much relates to the tool you use and the equipment the two of you wear. Some require more control than others. A regular "cutting" steel longsword requires more control than "thrusters" or a "feder". Certain wooden wasters require more control than others. Thus far, my experience is that nylons let you fence the most "freely" with little protection. BUT, you can of course hurt someone with a nylon as well... Still, several of the nylonmatches during the Swordfish event were pretty much full contact with little protection, and I wouldn't want to try that with steel or wooden weapons.

So while I agree with you, it is a complex issue with a range of aspects to consider.
Last edited by Roger Norling on Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:57 am, edited 6 times in total.
Quarterstaff instructor
Gothenburg Free Fencers Guild
http://www.gffg.se

Member of MFFG
http://www.freifechter.com

Member of HEMAC
http://www.hemac.org

HROARR
http://www.hroarr.com

Roger Norling
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:57 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Postby Roger Norling » Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:58 am

william_cain_iii wrote:Basically, they're a middle-range option between the 'starter' stuff like the Tinker Blunt and the Hanwei Federschwert, and higher end things like the ones you mention.

Durability is comparable to an Albion or AnA, but handling suffers a little. Still, they have a neat rolled tip so they don't need any additional blunting for safe thrusts.


Basically right I think. Looking at my heavier Ensifer feder: the durability is really good, although there was some burring initially on mine. This has settled after a bit of use, hammering and filing though. The handles are generally short, similar to the Albion Meyers, but considering that the blades are very thick at the cross, with about 1cm , they feel surprisingly point heavy. Not like real cutters, but quite different from Meyers or other federschwert. This gives them quite a bit of ompf... The price is less than half of an Albion sparring sword with about 165€, so that is very attractive. And the fact that they appear to be made of fire steel is pretty cool. :)

The rolled point is good, but putting a rubber blunt on top of it is still good. The blades are quite stiff, clearly stiffer than Albion Meyers and much more than any other "feder" I have held.

The standard feders have a rough finish, which is OK considering the durability and intended use. But, he offers fully polished swords as well:

http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#1
http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#2
http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#3
http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#8

The standard feder comes in two versions: one heavier at 1550gr and a lighter at 1350gr. As stated earlier, mine is the heavier.

http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#4
http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#5
http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#6
http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#9


Sparring messer
http://ensifer.carbonmade.com/projects/96362#7

Fechtschule Gdansk uses Ensifer swords for all sparring, since the swordsmith, Jan Chodkiewicz is a prominent member of that school. He is also a very good fencer.

Considering how hard these guys fence, I would expect the Ensifer sparring swords to hold up as well as Albions, at least. But I only have his heavier feder, so I can't say for sure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQb7K90UqVE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr9Mtc4kveA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr5Kwnqiy-k
Quarterstaff instructor
Gothenburg Free Fencers Guild
http://www.gffg.se

Member of MFFG
http://www.freifechter.com

Member of HEMAC
http://www.hemac.org

HROARR
http://www.hroarr.com

Hans Meier
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:21 pm

Postby Hans Meier » Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:56 am

Roger Norling wrote:And the fact that they appear to be made of fire steel is pretty cool. :)


wuts that? fire steel?

Roger Norling
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:57 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Postby Roger Norling » Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:12 pm

Hans Meier wrote:
Roger Norling wrote:And the fact that they appear to be made of fire steel is pretty cool. :)


wuts that? fire steel?


Just kidding... I've never seen swords that give off as many sparks during fencing. Quite impressive in a way. :)

Fire steel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_firesteel

http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/tools/754d/
Quarterstaff instructor
Gothenburg Free Fencers Guild
http://www.gffg.se

Member of MFFG
http://www.freifechter.com

Member of HEMAC
http://www.hemac.org

HROARR
http://www.hroarr.com

User avatar
Stacy Clifford
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Postby Stacy Clifford » Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:08 pm

Roger Norling wrote:I used to think that holding back the strikes in the absolute last part before impact didn't affect the fencing, but I have since changed my mind a bit. Not to mention the thrusts which are very different depending on if you have flex or not.
Of course you still need to use control so that you do not permanently injure your partner and I certainly do agree with you that control is vital, but it very much relates to the tool you use and the equipment the two of you wear. Some require more control than others. A regular "cutting" steel longsword requires more control than "thrusters" or a "feder". Certain wooden wasters require more control than others. Thus far, my experience is that nylons let you fence the most "freely" with little protection. BUT, you can of course hurt someone with a nylon as well... Still, several of the nylonmatches during the Swordfish event were pretty much full contact with little protection, and I wouldn't want to try that with steel or wooden weapons.

So while I agree with you, it is a complex issue with a range of aspects to consider.


Yeah, I'm not saying the tool is completely irrelevant, you certainly have to adjust your control to whatever you are using, I'm just weighing the relative importance here. I use pretty much the same level of control when thrusting with anything because whether it's wood, steel or plastic, they can all cause significant damage. For cutting I tend to adjust my power based on the weight and speed of the sword in my hand for consistency, which I think is probably how most people actually do it instinctively. We've found that some people (not everybody) were actually getting more injuries, and more severe, with the plastic wasters because they got a false sense of security from the material. If you play too hard with them, you effectively negate any safety advantages they might otherwise have over wood. This is also one reason why we don't use padded swords any more (besides the fact that they make winding & binding almost impossible).
0==[>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Stacy Clifford
Free-Scholar
ARMA Houston, TX

Anonymous

Postby Anonymous » Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:46 am

I've been looking at the Raven for a while now and in all the demos, the people have all been wearing button down long sleeve shirts. :roll: :roll:


Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.