Combatives

European historical unarmed fighting techniques & methods

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Guest

Re: Combatives

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 15, 2003 3:24 am

Since this has gone to the subject of knife defense, I'll point out that many of the (non-Filipino based) knife defense teachings that are coming out these days, use wrestling as their primary base. The Straight Blast Gym Folks and some of their friends have recently published some videos on the subject. The two on one, the under-hook and other stand-up wrestling techniques of western wrestling appear to be favored. Western wrestlings is also being employed more and more by LEO's to control unarmed and armed.

Guest

Re: Combatives

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:41 am

Well I think its not the teknik that is important but the attitude behind it. Therefor its possible bouth to grab and to parry a knife if you attitude is to kill or just defend yourself. And a good knife user would newer show his knife before he stabs you so probobly it would be hard to defend against somting you haven´t detected. Therefore it would consider when this tekniks ar applyed in a barfight without armour or in a duel or on battlefield with armour. Perhapps you ar more likely to rely on your armour when you do diffrent tekniks ?? Or wise wersa your armour prevents you from doing some tekniks.

Ex if you grab his knif arm he probobly wount run away when you hit him with your own knife. But if you block him you probobly considering closing in and controll/stab/take him down so you can get in his armour on closer range.
And wrestling is very good if you just want to take him down and controll him but it will make you wounrabell againgst other opponents and it very timettaking.

Guest

Re: Combatives

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:07 pm

Wrestling doesn't mean you're going to the ground. Lots of really good control in the clinch. From an underhook with far arm (knife hand) wrist control, I can jack you up and put you where I want. You can't switch knife hands, because the hands can't come together,

second comment

BJJ also doesn't mean going to the ground. Just because all the so called BJJ blackbelts only know and teach sport bjj, doesn't mean the Jiu-jitsu taught by the Gracies doesn't include a large number of stand-up techniques.
last comment

I'm finding the Army and Groups like the SBG are coming to the same conclusion. Combative sport is a really good way of learning and practicing real fighting skills.

Stuart McDermid
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 8:48 pm

Re: Combatives

Postby Stuart McDermid » Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:11 pm

Hi Jay,

This is based on training for various lengths of time in about 10 different gyms as well as on the pictures of attacks found in the large number of martial arts and military HTH combat books I own. I have viewed as much footage as possible of real attacks as well as grilling as many people as possible in the details of real attacks.

On Monday I spent two solid hours with my friends practising knife defence in the half light of a car park at pretty much full speed and contact with training knives. I do this regularly. Grabbing the knife is difficult here. Most often I get a left arm parry and a serpentine arm wrap as I hit the knifer in the face and stomp his legs.

Have you done more than this to be in a position to refute me?
In any case, is there a way you can logically dispute my above claim?

Also, I have over the years when meeting people who have never trained in knife fighting given them a training knife and told them to attack me. Most of them grab the knife in reverse grip and attack straight down the centreline with repeated stabs. Some adopt hammer grip and try to stab upwards. They do this either by shuffling or by simply running at me. I have never seen anyone outside of select Historical fencing groups who fully understands the utility of the pass and it's relationship to the true and false times.

Jonnie is IMHO correct in his assertions about knifing and wrestling. Gerald, wrestling against an untrained attacker (admittedly the majority) will most likely work just fine. Against someone trained in a proper prison or "real" Military HTH system such as the applegate method I can see this being a disaster. An "Applegate" knifer moves in with his knife held well back and his left arm and foot forward. This means he can hold back his attack until well after contact if he wishes. As such, you cannot close right in to defend against this. You must force him to attack you by making him commit from out of close distance. If he makes contact with the left arm and manages to keep his knife in reserve then you are going to be stabbed for sure.

A two on one is an attainable position and a good one to be here but IMHO moving close enough to underhook is a bad bad idea. You will notice that chaps like Talhoffer only move to close distance after either securing the knife arm or parrying it well away.
Cheers,
Stu.

User avatar
Shane Smith
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:15 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: Combatives

Postby Shane Smith » Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:52 pm

Stu Wrote:"Compare this to Kill or Get Killed available here in pdf www.gutterfighting.org or any other manual written in wartime or derived from wartime combatives and you will see a great difference. "

Thanks for the link Stu. I downloaded "Kill or Get Killed" and am enjoying it immensely. <img src="/forum/images/icons/grin.gif" alt="" />
Shane Smith~ARMA Forum Moderator
ARMA~VAB
Free Scholar

Stuart McDermid
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 8:48 pm

Re: Combatives

Postby Stuart McDermid » Wed Jul 16, 2003 4:46 pm

Great to hear Shane,

KOGK is one of the big ones.
If you "catch the bug" as I have check out the following books.
1. The Close Combat Files of Col. Rex Applegate" (Maj C. Melson)
2. Get Tough (W.E. Fairbairn)
3. Cold Steel (John Styers)

The last is particularly good for knife on knife and Bayonet work.
Cheers,
Stu.

Guest

Re: Combatives

Postby Guest » Thu Jul 17, 2003 6:14 pm

On the two knife stances, knife hand to the rear or modified saber stance, I find little favor with the protecting the knife with my body, much preferring the modified saber stance from Cold Steel. I've just found I give up too many attacks by putting my body in front of my knife.

User avatar
TimSheetz
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 4:55 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Combatives

Postby TimSheetz » Thu Jul 17, 2003 7:36 pm

Gerald

Of course, the knife back is a good way to start if they don't know you have a knife. ;-)

Seriously, I think I tend to agree with you on the stances.. though I alternate them frequently in training.

Tim
Tim Sheetz
ARMA SFS

Guest

Re: Combatives

Postby Guest » Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:02 am

After reading the above, I would like to say a couple of things. First, I like the way the discussion has come around to the use of the knife/dagger in close combat. In the post Vietnam era we have very few examples of soldiers who were armed with a knife band who actually employed it effectively when they were engaged in close combat. The main two reasons are that soldiers were not armed with a bladed weapon, or that they had absolutely no practice drawing it under duress. This is not to mention completely inadequate training, all of which are things that we are attempting to remedy.

Second I would like to refer you to this web site, www.moderncombatives.org

I will address beginning the training with ground grappling when I have more time.

I would also like you all to know that I enjoy the quality of the discussions that I have seen from the members of the ARMA and to let you know that you are contributing to the continued development of the modern army combatives program.

Matt Larsen

User avatar
Randall Pleasant
Posts: 872
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:35 pm
Location: Flower Mound, Texas, USA

Re: Combatives

Postby Randall Pleasant » Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:40 am

Matt

Just want to let you know that ARMA scholar Kirk Siemsen, who was not able to attend the International Event, has recently completed a translation of the dagger techniques in Goliath. Hopefully Kirk's translation will soon be available to the public.
Ran Pleasant

User avatar
TimSheetz
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 4:55 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Combatives

Postby TimSheetz » Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:04 pm

Hi Matt,

I think a very overlooked skill in most "knife training" is putting the knife into operation under duress.

I have an "el cheapo" tactical folder that I have rendered edgeless and pointless. Great training trying to get that out and open while grappling.

Thanks for coming to the ARMA gathering. It was great to meet you and train with you.

Thanks,
Tim Sheetz

ARMA SFS

Guest

Re: Combatives

Postby Guest » Sun Jul 20, 2003 5:44 am

Wow, I’m always pleased with myself when I draw conclusions and then have them later reinforced by discovering that others have came to the same conclusions.

I’ve been doing a lot of reading in the area of martial history and one of the things I’ve noticed is that almost every warrior in the days of old, practiced wrestling as part of his martial skills.

I have just recently been able to read Mr. Anglo’ The Martial Arts of Renaissance Europe. (This week) In chapter VI, Bare hands, daggers and knifes, and have had some of my own conclusions read back to me. If the warriors and fighters of old placed so much emphasis on wrestling and wrestling with daggers, I wonder why so many of the HTH instructors of the last century did not. The conclusion I’m starting to suspect is that they didn’t know how to wrestle. If you didn’t wrestle in school, where would you learn it. If you learned all your fighting from EMA, again you would have little expose to the bread and butter of western wrestling, the Clinch. Without ever learning western wrestling and with the very prevalent belief of striking being superior to wrestling. ( a belief that I grew up with, the Gracies showed us the error of that belief). It’s natural for the developers of HTH programs and systems to place an emphasis on techniques other than wrestling. Before anyone points out judo, remember the “spirit of judo” forbids many effective techniques as not being ‘good judo’. So where as almost all of the authors of HTH had trained in judo, I’m thinking none trained in western wrestling, especially Greco-roman. I posted a little of this over on the Dog Brothers forum a few months ago.

Jay Vail
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 2:35 am

Re: Combatives

Postby Jay Vail » Sun Jul 20, 2003 5:53 am

On Monday I spent two solid hours with my friends practising knife defence in the half light of a car park at pretty much full speed and contact with training knives. I do this regularly. Grabbing the knife is difficult here. Most often I get a left arm parry and a serpentine arm wrap as I hit the knifer in the face and stomp his legs.

Have you done more than this to be in a position to refute me?
In any case, is there a way you can logically dispute my above claim?


Stuart, It sounds a lot like you’re training to defend against the attacks of a skilled opponent, or someone with a sparring mindset. As we’ve discussed above, this sort of attack involves a cautious, often feinting opponent, whose attacks will not necessary mirror the types of blade assaults typically encountered on the street. I do not mean to say you should not train against such attacks, just that they are highly unlikely. I often get “killed” in such exercises, but I’ve done fairly well with a Fiore approach rather than a blocking/parrying approach, although I agree with you that it is really tough to catch someone’s hand when they are flicking it out in snap cuts. It is easier to catch the committed blow.

Also, I have over the years when meeting people who have never trained in knife fighting given them a training knife and told them to attack me. Most of them grab the knife in reverse grip and attack straight down the centreline with repeated stabs. Some adopt hammer grip and try to stab upwards. They do this either by shuffling or by simply running at me. I have never seen anyone outside of select Historical fencing groups who fully understands the utility of the pass and it's relationship to the true and false times


This is exactly the type of attack you can usually expect in street combat. Except you often don't see it coming.

I represented a prison guard once in a lawsuit that sprang from a knife attack on him by an inmate. The inmate, a huge guy of about 250, attacked the CO from behind using the icepick. The initial blow entered the back below the shoulder blade and punctured the left lung, causing it to collapse. Despite this and tremendous pain, the CO turned to confront the inmate, who immediately struck again. The CO raised his arm to deflect the blow with a forearm parry, but the blade went clear through his forearm. He fell down. The inmate bent over him to continue the attack, striking again with the icepick. The CO raised the same arm in defense, and the shank went through the palm of his hand.

At this point, another CO intervened. He was a big guy himself, although not as big as the inmate. The 2d CO took off his belt and began swinging its large buckle at the inmate in an attempt to drive him off the man on the floor. This worked and the two got into a wrestling match. The 2d CO managed to get a grip on the inmate’s arm and disarmed him. At this point more CO’s piled on and subdued the inmate.

Several lessons can be derived from this story.

First, the attack was an ambush. This is consistent with what I have read and been told by people who have been there. It is consistent with my own personal experience, where I was attacked without warning by a knifer.

Second, despite debilitating wounds, the first CO was still able to function and might have been able to defend himself if he had had adequate training. All he knew, however, was country wrestling.

Third, the knifer was disarmed following a grab rather than a parry. The parries were ineffective and resulted only in further injury to the defender. The 2d CO, who disarmed the knifer, was not injured by the blade. He suffered bruises in the struggle, as I recall.

Fourth, the attack was committed and there was no faking involved, and was delivered from the icepick. As I stated earlier, this is one method that inmates train each other with on the yard. I have a video of them doing this in San Quentin, and my informants in the Florida prison system assured me this goes on in our prisons as well.

Against someone trained in a proper prison or "real" Military HTH system such as the applegate method I can see this being a disaster. An "Applegate" knifer moves in with his knife held well back and his left arm and foot forward. This means he can hold back his attack until well after contact if he wishes. As such, you cannot close right in to defend against this. You must force him to attack you by making him commit from out of close distance. If he makes contact with the left arm and manages to keep his knife in reserve then you are going to be stabbed for sure.


This is quite true. I've experimented with various approaches over time, and the Applegate works very well against someone who is not armed with a knife himself.

The Applegate, however, has its own vulnerabilities. That leading arm is one of them. If you are attacked by someone using the Applegate, the best course seems to be to ignore the knife hand and attack the leading arm. Against guys using the Applegate, one good response is to put the guy into waki gatamae (the armpit armbar). I've had guys screaming and tapping out doing that. Interestingly, something like that is illustrated in one of the fecthbuchen, Hans Czyner.

Ikkyo also works well against the Applegate.

Nothing is perfect, and I have often been "killed" by a guy coming at me with the Applegate, though.

All this said, Stuart, I do not mean to disparage your view point or training. Please do not think that is my intention. Having been injured doing what I was taught in MA against a knife attack, I view everyone's experience, except that gained from actual street experience, with a strong element of caution and doubt until it is verified by actual combat.

Guest

Re: Combatives

Postby Guest » Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:21 pm

What sort of system do they learn in the US army. Have they diffrent?? I am from Sweden so I don´t know. What I learnd when I was in the swedisharmy was that you only should go in to a closecombat if you are ATLEAST 2 against 1, If you were less or the same number you should run. Explanise the system they use in sweden.


Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

 
 

Note: ARMA - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.