Postby Matt Shields » Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:31 am
Quite Interesting.
I find the one handed stance on the bottom left quite odd. And the stance on the top right completely bewilders me. With the blade pointed at that angle, it seems like cutting (the only option,) would require some bizarre lower back twisting to gain a full arc.
Over all, It seems much closer to Renaissance Two-Hander use than the Longsword. With that said, it almost seems as if the sword weighed too much for the user...
The placement of the feet seems a little off, but that could be due to the quality of the illustration (unlikely.)
But for the third and fourth page;
I don't understand what kind of sword is being used is being used, since these illustrations are from the Sixteenth Century, perhaps an imported Katana. I was under the impression the Chinese two handed sabers were much more wide and had an inverted grip (apparently not used for draw-cuts.) But I find it intriguing how much more similar the use of the straight sword is to our own martial arts than the curved blade.
And why with that blade with such a long grip, predominantly use one handed stances?